Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided February 8, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Director White,

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your letter asking for an official opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:

1. What is the amount of the annual levy that school districts must, pursuant to 62 O.S. 431 (1991), impose to retire their outstanding bonded indebtedness?

2. Is the method for making annual levies set forth in 62 O.S. 431 (1991) consistent with Article X, Section 28 of the Oklahoma Constitution?

¶ 1 School districts are authorized to issue bonds for the purpose of constructing, equipping, repairing and remodeling school buildings; acquiring school…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. McMahan v. Board of Ed., Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Berryman v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Lewis v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API