St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bailey, Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
The parties to this action appear in the relation as in the district court.
The plaintiff filed its petition in the district court in which is challenged the legality of a levy of 2.75 mills for the county highway fund, which levy was in excess of the levy made by the county excise board for current expenses of said county. This question was decided against the contentions of " the plaintiff , in the court below, and-is here presented for' revie,w. ' " ' ... " -. The plaintiff in its petition also challenged the.. correctness of__a .-leyy for the benefit of the sinking fund of school.;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Franklin v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. PrinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Prince v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.