Legal Opinion

People v. Odlum

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1949No. Crim. 4318PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence. While the motion is denominated as stated, we construe it to be also a motion to vacate a plea of guilty.

Defendant was charged by information with four counts of issuing checks without sufficient funds, felonies, and a prior conviction of forgery, a felony, in Minnesota, and serving a term therefor in the state prison. He pleaded not guilty to each count and admitted the prior conviction.

On December 18, 1947, the date of trial, the following proceedings took place: “The Court : People against Jerome Odium. Mr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. GottliebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. Van ValkenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. Odlum v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API