City of Austin v. Hall

I quote the following from the brief of appellant:

“An abundance of caution prompted this appeal. Appellant is of the opinion that the judgment entered on November 5, 1968 may be interlocutory, but in view of opinions of the Supreme Court ‘and other courts in which the terms “separate trial” and “severance” have been treated as synonymous,’ Kansas University Endowment Ass’n v. King [162 Tex. 599], 350 S.W.2d 11, 19 (Tex.Sup. 1961), Appellant perfected this appeal, preferring to have an order of dismissal from this court than a later decision that the trial court entered an erroneous order of…