Legal Opinion

Wyant v. Director of Agriculture

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1954No. Docket 60; Calendar 46,112PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff, Ross E. Wyant, owns a bee farm in the State of Ohio close to the southern Michigan line. For some time prior to the commencement of this suit he had moved bees from Ohio into Michigan and later returned them to Ohio. The movement of bees is seasonal, being influenced by crops growing in a certain area at a given time. In such movement bees are transported in hives, combs or other used apiary appliances. It is a known fact that bees pollinate various crops in the vicinity where the hives are located. Bees are subject to a disease known as foul brood. The only practical method of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Train v. Boston Disinfecting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Ex Parte ElamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. RaubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Nunley v. Texas Animal Health CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Grayson v. Board of AccountancyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API