Legal Opinion

Moore v. Humana Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 23, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00232Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION KENA MOORE, et al. Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-232-RGJ HUMANA INC., et al. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Kena Moore, Timothy K. Sweeney, Russel A. Hohman, Susan M. Smith, and Veronica Cargill (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, move to exclude the expert opinion of Pete Swisher (“Swisher”) and for summary judgment. [DE 100; DE 101]. Defendants Humana Inc. (“Humana”) and Humana Retirement Plans Committee (the “Committee”)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API