Legal Opinion

National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Frankel

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1988No. B029970PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FUKUTO, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment rejecting an insurer’s assertion of noncoverage under the uninsured motorist portion of an automobile insurance policy.

The insurer sued its insured for a judicial declaration of noncoverage. The insured cross-complained against the insurer for bad faith, pleading the usual tort, contract, and statutory theories of recovery. This cross-complaint was severed, and its resolution deferred, while the insurer’s declaratory judgment claim was tried. Consequently the declaratory judgment from which the insurer appeals is a nonfinal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Security National Insurance v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Grunfeld v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Kirby v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bohannan v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Swan Magnetics, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Rubin v. Western Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Day v. PapadakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API