State v. Paul Aiken
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Dooley, J.
Defendant appeals the decision of the Orange Superior Court, Criminal Division denying his motion to suppress his refusal to submit to an evidentiary breath test on the ground that he was denied his right to counsel under 23 V.S.A. § 1202. We affirm.
¶ 2. The following facts are undisputed. On November 12, 2013, shortly before midnight, defendant was pulled over for speeding. The police sergeant observed that defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and watery, and he detected a faint odor of alcohol coming from inside defendant’s vehicle. Defendant admitted to consuming alcohol prior to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- State v. LombardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Skaskiw and Vermont Volunteer Services for Animals Humane SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Kent EatonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026
- State v. William LanzettaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Sutton v. Saint-Sauveur Valley Resorts, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2020