Legal Opinion
Watt v. Combs
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 18, 1943No. 6 Div. 80PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
The appellee, plaintiff below, brought suit against three defendants, namely, Carol Watt (appellant), Lucius Colmant, Jr., and Virginia Woodson, claiming damages for the loss of the services of his wife, for expenses incurred in the treatment of her injuries, and for property damages to his automobile, as a result of an automobile accident which occurred on the 21st day of August, 1940. Mrs. Combs, the wife of the appellee, also brought suit against the same defendants, claiming damages for personal injuries which she received as a result of the accident. The two cases were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Aplin v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Garrett v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Alabama Power Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Vines v. Plantation Motor LodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- City of Mobile v. HavardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- American Automobile Insurance Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.