State v. MacOn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHuskins, J.
The only constitutional question preserved and presented here for review is whether or not the trial court erred in allowing Deputy Sheriff Connie Holmes and Deputy Sheriff W. L. Pritchett, over objection, to act as court officers or bailiffs during the trial of this case in spite of the fact that both officers were witnesses and testified against the defendant. Defendant contends this amounted to a denial of Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment and was a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to be tried "by an impartial jury of' the state and district wherein the crime shall have been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. SneedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Stone v. Griffin Baking Co. of Greensboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.