Prudential Trust Co. v. Moore
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.
The cases against Moore and Barrett are actions at law, and those against the other defendants are suits in equity to reach and apply assets. They were brought to recover on certain promissory notes, each for the sum of $12,500, dated May 4, 1920, payable on demand to the Prudential Trust Company, and admittedly signed by the defendants respectively. The defence set up in each case was lack of consideration and fraud. The causes were tried together; issues for the jury on these defences having been framed in the equity suits. The plaintiff rested after putting the notes in evidence. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. AbercrombieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Hurd v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Davis v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Union Bank v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Indian Head National Bank v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Salem Trust Co. v. DeeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Tremont Trust Co. v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Prudential Trust Co. v. McCarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.