Smith v. Daniel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This was an action for breach of promise of marriage, brought by the appellant, in which the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. An undue amount of time and space was devoted, in the briefs and at the argument, to questions of fact as to which the parties are foreclosed in this court. Where there has been, as there was here, substantial evidence in support of the verdict, we may consider only questions of law properly saved during the trial of the ease. While there were thirty-seven assignments of error, only two were presented to the court at the oral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Armour & Co. v. KollmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Pennsylvania Co. v. FangerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cole Bryan Howell, III v. Cheryl RyerkerkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
- Tsesmelys v. Dublin Truck Leasing Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
- Rich v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- In Re: D. H. Overmyer Telecasting Co., Inc., Co., Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Warriner v. James Archer Smith Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971