Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. Fanger

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1916No. 2680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of the Eastern Division of Ohio; William L. Day, Judge. Action by.Kathryne Fanger, by her next friend, Margaret Fanger, against the Pennsylvania Company.

1Opinion of the Court

SANFORD, District Judge.

This is an action at law brought by Kathryne Fanger, a citizen and resident of Ohio, by next friend, against the Pennsylvania Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, to recover damages for alleged personal injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision while a passenger on defendant’s train. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff; and the defendant has brought this writ of error.

The chief contention in behalf of the plaintiff in error is that there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in denying it a continuance. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Pacific Express Co. v. MalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Wabash Screen Door Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. DanielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API