Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Olson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1945No. File No. 8735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

The question for decision arises under a motion to dismiss this appeal from a judgment and an order dismissing a motion for a new trial. The contention is that Ch. 124, Laws of 1943, which became effective after the entry of the judgment, governed appellant’s procedure, and that, as the motion for new trial was made, and the subsequent appeal was taken, after the time fixed by that act had elapsed, the appeal should be dismissed.

The judgment was entered on the 6th day of May, 1943. The statute, SDC 33.0702, then read as follows: “An appeal to the Supreme Court must be taken within sixty days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. City of Plankinton v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Northwest Finance Co. v. BottumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Rempfer v. JordanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Nelson v. KittelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API