Legal Opinion

City of Plankinton v. Kieffer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1944No. File Nos. 8672-8673PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Plaintiffs in, these two actions commenced in the Circuit Court of Aurora county sought to enjoin the removal of a dwelling house from the corporate limits of the city of Plankinton. ■ ' The complaint in the action commenced September 25, 1942, alleges that plaintiff A. Y. DePue is the mayor of the city of Plankinton and is a taxpayer therein; that he brings the action for himself individually and on behalf of all other; residents, electors and taxpayers in the city; that the city has an indebtedness of $6,491.55 represented by. registered warrants; that the Plankinton Independent School…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Clarke v. County of BeadleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dodds v. BickleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Moore v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Stanley County School District No. 57-1 v. Stanley County Education Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sullivan v. SullivanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API