Legal Opinion

United States v. Susan Pioch

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 30, 2018No. 17-3500; 17-3537; 17-3538PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THAPAR, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Kurt Mallory, Margaret McKnight, and Susan Pioch on various charges arising from a scheme to pilfer Martin Fewlas's sizeable estate. The Defendants appeal their convictions, and Mallory and Pioch further challenge their sentences. We AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, VACATE Mallory's and Pioch's sentences in part, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

Martin Fewlas looked the part of a bar-dweller. Most days, he frequented various neighborhood establishments, drinking beer. At one such locale, he befriended Margaret McKnight.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Michael Walden v. General Electric Int'lCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. Erick HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Maurice Duncan BurksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Susan PiochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. Averett v. HardyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API