Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals v. Wetherald
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals, its individual members, and Steve Rucker (collectively “BZA”) appeal from a judgment reversing the BZA’s decision denying applications for zoning variances filed by Tom Wetherald. We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
We restate and consolidate the issues on appeal as:
•1. Is the instant appeal moot because the BZA failed to obtain a stay pending appeal, and in the interim, Wetherald obtained a building permit, completed improvements, and is currently operating his business on the lot in question in accordance with the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Boffo v. Boone County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bartholomew County Hospital v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- B & G Constr. Corp. v. Bd. of Appeals of the Vill. of AmityvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Town of Merrillville Board of Zoning Appeals v. Public Storage, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Plumlee v. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Hobart Common Council v. Behavioral Institute of Indiana, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Indiana State Ethics Commission v. NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ebzery v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. KempfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.