Tiller v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtI’Anson, J.
This is a condemnation suit instituted by the Norfolk and Western Railway Company against Fannie Tiller, Maxie T. Mullins, Tollie E. Mullins, Rachel Barton, Ira Barton, Hattie Ashworth, Eugene Ashworth, Graham A. Tiller, Janie Ruth Tiller, J. Bernard Tüler, Mona Tiller, Elaine T. Duty and Dewey Duty, all heirs at law of Eivens Tiller, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, to take certain lands owned by the defendants and a section of a secondary State highway in Dickenson county, Virginia, for the purpose of constructing a railroad spur line up Tiller Fork and relocating the section of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. HeidenreichIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Pitznogle v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Highway & Transportation Commissioner v. HerndonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- N. C. State Highway Commission v. Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Stewart v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. BaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.