Legal Opinion

DiMase v. Aquamar 176, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 2002No. 3D01-915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

835 So.2d 1150 (2002)

Julian DiMASE and Gaetano DiMase, Appellants,

v.

AQUAMAR 176, INC., and Chicago Title Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 3D01-915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 29, 2002.

Armstrong & Mejer, P.A., and Alvaro L. Mejer, for appellants.

Frankel & Lieberman, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel, for appellees.

Before JORGENSON, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

2Per curiam

Prospective buyers appeal from an order of final summary judgment in an action brought against the sellers to recover deposits for the purchase of two condominium units. We affirm.

Julian and Gaetano DiMase signed purchase…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Robbie v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Blackhawk Heat. & P. Co., Inc. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Gendzier v. BieleckiSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. OBS Co., Inc. v. Pace Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Sorocka v. SevereDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. DiMase v. Aquamar 176, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Larrea v. Fisher Island Holdings, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API