Sorocka v. Severe
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, J.
This is an appeal of an order that enforces a settlement agreement and enters final summary judgment. Because the acceptance of the offer did not mirror the offer as made, we reverse.
In 2001, appellants Olga Sorocka, Walter Sorocka, and Kristina Sorocka were in*389jured in an automobile accident. A month later, their attorney sent a letter to Ams-tar Insurance Company, appellee Patrick Severe’s insurance carrier in which the Sorockas offered to settle the bodily injury claims for $20,000.00, the limit on Severe’s insurance policy. They also stated that they had a property damage claim for $750.00…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cheverie v. GeisserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Giovo v. McDonaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Ribich v. Evergreen Sales & Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Theocles v. LytrasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vision Palm Springs v. Coscan Palm SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Largaespada v. LargaespadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005