Legal Opinion
DiMase v. Aquamar 176, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 29, 2003No. 3D01-915PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
835 So.2d 1158 (2003)
Julian DiMASE and Gaetano DiMase, Appellants,
v.
AQUAMAR 176, INC., & Chicago Title Company, Appellees.
No. 3D01-915.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
January 29, 2003.
Armstrong & Mejer, P.A., and Alvaro L. Mejer, and Timothy J. Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Robert P. Frankel & Associates, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel, Miami, for appellees.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN, GODERICH, GREEN, FLETCHER, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Prior report: 835 So.2d 1150.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
The appellants' motion for rehearing en banc is granted and…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- DiMase v. Aquamar 176, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4Cited by1 opinion
- Sorocka v. SevereDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003