Legal Opinion

Wade v. Deniston

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Drucilla Newton successfully prosecuted a suit to cancel a deed which she had executed to Robert Deniston. The deed canceled conveyed an interest in oil royalties, and, as an incident to this relief, judgment was rendered against Deniston for $686.98, covering the amount of royalties collected prior to the cancellation of the deed. Deniston v. Newton, 175 Ark. 1169, 300 S. W. 929.

An execution issued upon this judgment, directed to the sheriff of Ouachita County,, but a return nulla bona was made. Later a second execution was also directed to the sheriff of Ouachita County, which was levied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huffman v. GainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. McLaughlin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Woods v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duhon v. GravettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. United States v. WeirDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
  3. Stephens v. WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API