Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided December 9, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Bobby Tullis State Representative Box 277 Mineral Springs, AR 71851

Dear Representative Tullis:

This is in response to your request on the following two questions regarding the necessity of specifying property to be seized in a writ of execution under Act 389 of 1991, codified at A.C.A. § 16-66-104 (Cum. Supp. 1991):(1) Is the form provided in Arkansas Code Annotated 16-66-104 as amended by Act 389 of 1991 required to be used for writs of execution and, if so, when used, how specifically must the property be described which is to be seized by the sheriff?(2) If the form provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duhon v. GravettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Wade v. DenistonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API