Legal Opinion
Diessner v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 18, 2009No. 4:09-cr-00095PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
[Re: Motion at Docket 7]
JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTION PRESENTED
At docket 7, defendants Aurora Loan Services, LLC (“Aurora”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) move to dismiss plaintiffs complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). At docket 8, plaintiff Michael Diessner (“Diessner”) opposes the motion. Defendants Aurora and MERS reply at docket 10. Oral argument was not requested and it would not assist the court.
II. BACKGROUND
Michael Diessner obtained a mortgage loan for $980,000 from Metrocities…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re WeisbandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Gallant v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- Long v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- GOSSEN v. JPMorgan Chase BankDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.