Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1998No. 96-60515PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (“Hartford”), and against plaintiff-appellant Thomas Allen Rogers (“Rogers”) on the issue of whether Hartford had a legitimate or arguable reason to initially deny workers’ compensation benefits to Rogers. We conclude that there was no legitimate or arguable reason to initially deny Rogers benefits, and therefore vacate the district court’s order granting summary judgment, render partial summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Burden v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. HollandMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Luckett v. Mississippi Wood Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Teresa Patrick v. Wal-Mart, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Couch v. Astec Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
  3. Ullman v. Safeway InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  4. Hood v. Sears Roebuck & Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005
  5. Toney v. LOWERY WOODYARDS AND EMPLOYER'S INS.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API