Legal Opinion
Hood v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided June 23, 2005No. 3:02-cv-00405PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY T. WINGATE, Chief Judge.
Before this court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Sears Roebuck & Company (“Sears”). Submitted pursuant to Rule 56(b) 1 and (c), 2 Sears’ motion asks this court to find as a matter of law that Sears should be dismissed from this action. Although plaintiff Frances Elaine Hood opposes the motion, this court is persuaded to grant it for the reasons which follow.
I. BACKDROP
At a status conference on November 10, 2004, the court had a discussion -with the parties about the defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss. v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryant v. State FarmDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Sylvia F. Minor v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Sylvia F. Minor v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- The Dewey Street Church of Christ v. Church Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Triumph Church of God in Christ v. Church Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021