Legal Opinion
State v. Borg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 21, 2011No. A09-0243PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
A Mille Lacs County jury found Brett David Borg guilty of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn.Stat. § 609.844, subd. 1(d) (2002). The district court allowed a police officer to testify in the State’s case in chief that Borg did not respond to a mailed request for an interview by the officer. The court of appeals reversed Borg’s conviction, concluding that the district court erred when it allowed the officer to testify about “silence in response to police questions or attempts to pose questions.” State v. Borg, 780 N.W.2d 8, 16 (Minn.App.2010). The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Molina, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Adam John LilienthalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. BorgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.