Legal Opinion

United States v. Sergeant JARED D. HERRMANN

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 18, 2016No. ARMY 20131064PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HAIGHT, Senior Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of willful dereliction in the performance of his duties and reckless endangerment, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934 (2012) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for ten months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of E-l.

This case is before our court for review under Article 66, UCMJ,2…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. BlockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. OuthierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  2. United States v. ForbesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  3. United States v. Sergeant JARED D. HERRMANNArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API