Legal Opinion

United States v. Herrmann

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 19, 2017No. 16-0599/ARPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge OHLSON

delivered the opinion of the Court. 1

A military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of willful dereliction of duty and one specification of reckless endangerment, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 934 (2012). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a reduction in grade to E-l, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for ten months, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged.

Upon review, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  3. United States v. OuthierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  2. United States v. DoyleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  3. United States v. DoyleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  4. United States v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  5. United States v. Sergeant DAIMON C. WEARArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API