Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Wilson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1983No. 79-7-367; CA A23865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

Husband seeks modification of a dissolution decree to terminate his $200 per month permanent spousal support obligation, relying primarily on wife’s remarriage. The trial court refused to modify the decree on the ground that there was not a sufficient unanticipated change in circumstances. Husband appeals that ruling and also assigns as error the trial court’s award of attorney fees to wife.

The dissolution decree was entered April 18, 1980, nunc pro tunc April 2, 1980. At that time husband was 55, wife was 51, and they had been married 18 years. In June, 1980, wife married, a man with whom…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Abraham v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of FeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. In re the Marriage of PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. In re the Marriage of EslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. In re the Marriage of BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. In re the Marriage of VasconcellosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API