Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Vasconcellos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. 80-3334-NJ-3; CA A24664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Husband appeals from a denial of his second motion to modify a Nevada dissolution decree by terminating spousal support. He contends that wife is “cohabitating” with a man and that the Nevada divorce decree provides for termination of support upon cohabitation.1 Husband initially sought to terminate support in a prior action commenced in October, 1981, based on the same anti-cohabitation provision of the Nevada decree. The trial judge in the first proceeding found that wife was not cohabitating with a man and denied husband’s motion to modify the decree. An appeal from that action was filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Matter of Marriage of VasconcellosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. C. M. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API