Legal Opinion

Osborn v. . Leach

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1903PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a petition to rehear this case, in which the judgment below was affirmed at the last term by a per curiam decision, 132 N.C. 1149. Percuriam decisions are made after as full consideration by the Court as those in which opinions are filed, but the principles involved being well settled, it is not deemed necessary to duplicate reasons which are to be found in other opinions.

On reargument we see no reason to change our former conclusion. This was an appeal from a refusal to set aside a judgment by default and inquiry on the ground alleged of excusable neglect. The code, sec. 274. The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Welch v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Holcomb v. . HolcombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Blow v. . JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Bigham v. . FoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API