Legal Opinion

State v. Zeigler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2017No. C–160428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deters, Judge.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, defendant-appellant Sean Zeigler argues the trial court committed plain error by failing to merge his convictions for aggravated burglary, two counts of rape, and felonious assault because they were allied offenses of similar import. Because the offenses were committed separately, the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to merge them. We, therefore, affirm its judgment.

The Charges

{¶ 2} In March 2015, Zeigler was charged in a six-count indictment. Zeigler was charged in counts one and two with aggravated burglary in violation of R.C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. BurrowsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. YoderOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. State v. ZeiglerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API