Legal Opinion

Filice & Perrelli Canning Co. v. Walton

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1928No. Docket No. 5701PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'STURTEVANT,

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants, the defendants appeared and answered, a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, the trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed.

The plaintiff’s complaint was framed in two counts. In the first count it pleaded a breach of contract, alleging that the defendants had failed to deliver personal property theretofore sold to the plaintiff. In the second count it alleged that the defendants had converted the property. The defendants filed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Turner, Kuhn & Fraser, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Jones v. California Growers & Shippers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  2. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Friedberg v. WeissbuchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. LeClercq v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Richardson-Bass v. State Center Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API