Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert M. Lee
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 7, 2003No. 01-4485, 01-4496PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WARD, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the district court’s judgment imposing a condition of supervised release, which requires appellant to submit to' random polygraph examinations at the discretion of the probation officer. Because we conclude that the condition does. not. violate appellant’s Fifth Amendment right and the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the polygraph condition, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
Appellant Albert Lee was arrested on February 15, 2000 for knowingly transporting child pornography by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jeffrey A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.