Legal Opinion

Melcher v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided October 24, 1955No. 516Published

1Opinion of the Court

Forrest, J.,

In this action on a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance, plaintiffs have moved for judgment on the complaint and answer. On such a motion the allegations of defendant’s answer are to be taken- as true. Further, summary judgment should be entered only in clear cases: Wark & Company v. Twelfth & Sansom Corporation, 378 Pa. 578 (1954); Toff v. Vlahakis, 380 Pa. 512 (1955). A part of the facts disclosed by the pleadings viewed in this light is *405stated in the excerpt from Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Melcher, 378 Pa. 598, 599-600 (1954) quoted in the opinion handed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wark & Co. v. Twelfth & Sansom Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Toff v. VlahakisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Armstrong v. Standard Ice Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. MelcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Stierheim v. Bechtold Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API