Legal Opinion

Alliance Ins. v. Continental Gin Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1926No. 799-4459PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICKELS, J.-

Handley Gin & Milling Company, a partnership, owned a gin plant, etc.; it owed Continental Gin Company, a corporation, certain indebtedness, to secure payment of which a -lien existed on machinery, etc., in the plant. Conn was the general manager and agent of the partnership. An obligation of the Continental Gin Company’s mortgage was that the property should be kept adequately insured and for its benefit as' its interest was. So far as the latter company was concerned, Conn’s authority was the selection (for it) of the insurance companies and procuration of policies from them.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. FaganTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Dalton v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Society v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Alliance Ins. Co. v. Continental Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Burch v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. First Bank & Trust of GrovesTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Earnest v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Presley v. National Flood Insurers AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API