Legal Opinion

Barron v. Chicoraske

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1941No. 29881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted on August 7, 1939, by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, and others not here involved, to recover an alleged balance due upon a promissory note dated April 8, 1931, and by its terms due on October 8, 1931, and which defendant had endorsed and delivered to the plaintiff in May, 1931, and on which the principals therein had made partial payments at intervals, the last of which was made on November 11, 1936.

The principals in said note permitted judgment to be rendered…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Schreiner v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Eichman v. CulverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Luster v. First Nat. Bank in Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Camp v. Black Gold Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Looney v. Bruin Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Sparks Bros. Drilling Co. v. Texas Moran Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Sparks Bros. Drilling Co. v. Texas Moran Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API