Legal Opinion

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Harrison

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 21, 1940No. 7305Published

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

The sole question on this appeal is whether the manufacturer’s excise tax on sporting goods, imposed by Section 609 of the Revenue Act of 1932, is applicable to bowling alleys. 47 Stat. 264, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev.Acts page 612.1 The tax was assessed against plaintiff (The BrunswickBalke-Collender Company), the assessment was paid under protest, and the claim for refund was-rejected. Thereafter the plaintiff brought this action to recover the amount paid under protest, the District Court found and held for plaintiff, and the defendant (Collector of Internal Revenue)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. AronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Mills Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Baltimore Talking Board Co. v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  4. Samuel Winslow Skate Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  5. Edward J. Darby & Son, Inc. v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API