Legal Opinion

Samuel Winslow Skate Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1931No. H-74PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

This tax ease involves a construction of section 900 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057, 1122). The sole issue'is whether the excise tax of ten per centum of the price for which a certain, type of roller skates was sold applies to that type. The taxing act taxed the manufacturer, producer, or importer ten per centum of the price for which “skates” were sold, and plaintiff contends that sidewalk roller skates, manufactured and adapted for use by children 'of from seven to twelve years of age in skating on sidewalks, are not taxable, and seeks refund of the taxes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. LaBelle Iron Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Jordan v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duradene Co. v. MagruderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937
  2. Norris Dispensers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  3. Sackman Bros. v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Athletic Shoe Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1937
  5. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API