Legal Opinion

Edward J. Darby & Son, Inc. v. Rothensies

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 3, 1940No. 7530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The appeal calls for a determination of whether hole cups, flag poles and markers designed for use on golf links are subject to the excise levied by Section 609 of the Revenue Act of 1932, c. 209, 47 Stat. 169, 264, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 612.1 The court below has held that they are not, construing Section 609, as levying a tax upon articles in three categories, viz., (1) the specifically named articles, (2) “games and parts of games”, and (3) “all similar articles commonly or commercially known as sporting goods”. Then applying the familiar rule of expressio…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mills Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago Flag & Decorating Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API