Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Cutlip

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1926No. 16177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This acticn was instituted in the district court of Pottawatomie county by defendant in error, as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, as de end-ants, to recover j.rdgment for $616 and cost. The action is based on an appeal bond duly executed by the defendant Douglas and Baker, as sureties, for one Mary Newtcn.

The facts, as disclosed by the record. sh< w that in September. 1922, the plaintiff, Cur-lip. instituted an action in the justice court against Mary Newton, for unlawful detention of 40 acres of land in Pottawatomie county. Upon the trial of that case in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waite v. TeetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Deisher v. GehreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burnham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Paxton v. DeardonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hanks v. Northwestern State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kinsey v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API