Legal Opinion

Waite v. Teeters

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from, Cowley District Court. Action by Teeters and another against Waite, to recover damages for the conversion of a one-half interest in certain corn. Trial at the April Term, 1885, and judgment for plaintiffs for $179.59 damages, and $215.35 costs. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

*6061. Forcible entry and detainer; practice. *604This is an action brought by Jacob Teeters and Peter McKinley against R. B. Waite, to recover for the conversion of a one-half interest in the corn grown upon sixty acres of land, the damages being placed at $300. It appears *605that on the 11th day of February, 1884, Waite leased his farm in Cowley county to C. J. Hess and L. F. Hess, for a term of one year; and the lease, as well as the statute, provided that the lessees should not underlet the premises to any other person without the consent of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri River R. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DundenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. McHenry v. HubbardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Dineen v. OlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Smith v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Mabry v. HarpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API