Vigil v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— D. Vigil and Pablo Padilla were jointly informed against for the crime of grand larceny. They were tried before a jury, which found Vigil guilty and Padilla not guilty, and, from the verdict and judgment, Vigil has prosecuted this appeal. The offense with which defendants were charged was the killing and stealing of a calf belonging to O. M. LaPrade. Vigil admitted on the stand that he had killed the calf, but claimed that at that time, and on similar previous occasions, he was acting as a “stool pigeon” for the Cattlemen’s Association in an endeavor to break up what was said to be an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawrence v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Crowell v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Lewis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Quong Yu v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. EisensteinArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. DaymusArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. FinleyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.