Legal Opinion

Crowell v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1913No. Criminal No. 329PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pinal. J. E. O’Connor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant and one Frank Nort were jointly indicted for the murder of William Dobson. Upon a separate trial appellant was convicted of second degree murder. From the judgment of conviction and order overruling his motion for a new trial he appeals.

Dobson came to his death from a gunshot wound inflicted by Nort. Appellant at the time the fatal shot was fired was *68not present, but was in his place of business some seventy-five or eighty feet away.

While the appellant and Nort were jointly indicted as

principals, the case was tried by the prosecution on the theory that Nort inflicted the fatal…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Farris v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. CastanedaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lawrence v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. MacIas v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. YslasArizona Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API