Legal Opinion

Quong Yu v. Territory of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1909No. Criminal No. 265PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

DOAN, J. —

The appellant in this case was convicted of burglary at the April term, 1908, of the district court of Maricopa county, and, from the judgment of conviction and the denial of the motion for a new trial, he appeals to this court, and assigns as error:

“(1) The court erred in giving the following instruction to the jury: ‘But if from the evidence you believe beyond a reasonable doubt that these goods were taken to this man’s place in connection with the attempted burglary, they being found there in his possession, this is a corroboration of the testimony of Arviso, which you would have…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BeardenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. MacIas v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. B.W.L. Sam v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Southern Arizona Freight Lines, Ltd. v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API