Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Murray

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1895No. 1,620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover damages for slanderous words spoken. It was alleged that the defendant called the plaintiff a whore.

The answer was in two paragraphs; first, a general denial; and, second, justification, that prior to the speaking of the words the plaintiff had illicit carnal connection with divers persons.

The cause was tried by a jury, which returned a general verdict, assessing plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $300.00, on which judgment was rendered.

The only assignment of error is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. It is insisted that the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Tull v. DavidIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Rodebaugh v. HollingsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. PaddockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Irwin v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Doran v. PriddyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API