Doran v. Priddy
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This case is a slander action. Plaintiff alleges that defendant called her a “little whore.” Plaintiff has filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude evidence that she participated in extramarital sexual affairs on the grounds that such evidence is irrelevant and prejudicial. In addition to denying that such a statement was made, defendant has asserted truth as a defense and claims that evidence of extramarital sex is relevant to whether plaintiff was a “whore” at the time of the alleged slander.
*455The legal issue in this case is the meaning of “whore.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnett v. PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Myrtle Hollman v. Catherine BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Peterson v. MurrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Rowe v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sharon v. Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984