Legal Opinion

Doran v. Priddy

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 4, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 79-1443PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THEIS, District Judge.

This case is a slander action. Plaintiff alleges that defendant called her a “little whore.” Plaintiff has filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude evidence that she participated in extramarital sexual affairs on the grounds that such evidence is irrelevant and prejudicial. In addition to denying that such a statement was made, defendant has asserted truth as a defense and claims that evidence of extramarital sex is relevant to whether plaintiff was a “whore” at the time of the alleged slander.

*455The legal issue in this case is the meaning of “whore.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnett v. PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Myrtle Hollman v. Catherine BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Peterson v. MurrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Rowe v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sharon v. Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API