Thurman v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendants’ negligence, claiming that he was injured while using defendants’ self-service car wash. He appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Shockman.1 We reverse.
Defendants Thomas are the owners of a parcel of real estate in Pendleton on which Shockman operates a self-service car wash. Located on the floor in the car wash is a round metal grate that fits over a sump, into which debris and water drain. The grate is similar to a manhole cover. On the day in question, plaintiff stepped on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Jones v. ObergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Stocking v. Sunset Square, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. SantoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Beachcraft Marine Corp. v. KosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Clement v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Edwards v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Tyler Lyman v. Driving Force Logistics, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, and Novae, LLC, an Indiana limited liability companyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026