Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1984No. 82-9-910; CA A29516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendants’ negligence, claiming that he was injured while using defendants’ self-service car wash. He appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Shockman.1 We reverse.

Defendants Thomas are the owners of a parcel of real estate in Pendleton on which Shockman operates a self-service car wash. Located on the floor in the car wash is a round metal grate that fits over a sump, into which debris and water drain. The grate is similar to a manhole cover. On the day in question, plaintiff stepped on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Jones v. ObergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Stocking v. Sunset Square, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. SantoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Beachcraft Marine Corp. v. KosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Clement v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
  4. Edwards v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Tyler Lyman v. Driving Force Logistics, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, and Novae, LLC, an Indiana limited liability companyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API