Legal Opinion

Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. Santoro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2006No. 04CV0058; A126173PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YRAGUEN, S. J.

Defendant (Santoro) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff (Citibank). Santoro raises four assignments of error. We write only to address Santoro’s contention that the trial court erred in determining that Citibank carried its burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact as to defendant’s liability for credit card debt. We affirm.

A party who moves for summary judgment bears the burden of showing that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fields v. Jantec, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Adair Homes, Inc. v. JarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. WSB INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Pronghorn Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. In Re PettingillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2009
  3. Langjahr v. Glorietta Bay, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. In Re GonzalezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  5. Lane v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API